Target
General merchandise retail chain
Reason: Leader in Ending DEI
For years, Target Stores cultivated a reputation as the friendly, community-minded alternative to big-box retail — a place where shopping felt warm, easy, and human. But inside the stores today, the experience tells a different story. Workers are stretched thin, interactions are scripted, and the environment feels increasingly managed from the top down. What customers see on the sales floor is no longer the result of genuine service culture, but of corporate mandates that prioritize optics, control, and compliance over the people who actually make the store run.
Evidence & Context
Target’s in-store experience has long been marketed as welcoming, inclusive, and community-centered. But recent policy shifts inside its stores tell a different story — one where workers face increased pressure, customer interactions are tightly scripted, and the shopping environment is shaped more by corporate risk-aversion and political conformity than authentic service or community care.
The New “10-4” Behavior Policy
In November 2025, Target rolled out a new rule called the “10-4 policy.” This directive requires employees to:
- Smile and make eye contact when a customer is within 10 feet
- Wave or greet proactively
- Offer help verbally when a customer is within 4 feet
Reporting from Fox19 and Business Insider shows how this policy has caused concern among staff who feel monitored and forced into artificial interactions during already stressful shifts.
For shoppers, this creates a more performative, less authentic environment — one driven by corporate control rather than genuine hospitality.
Retail Labor Under Strain
Target Stores relies heavily on frontline workers — including cashiers, floor associates, and fulfillment staff — yet recent store-level changes have increased pressure without providing additional support. Short-staffing, stricter customer interaction requirements, and increased performance oversight create an environment where employees feel stretched thin.
Customers often experience this indirectly through:
- Longer lines
- Reduced staffing in departments
- Slower assistance during high-volume hours
- More scripted, less personal interactions
These shifts prioritize corporate optics over community connection.
A Store Culture Shaped From the Top Down
Although Target Stores present themselves as friendly and approachable, the internal structure shaping the customer experience is increasingly rigid, surveilled, and reactive. The “smile-and-engage” mandate isn’t about better service — it’s about compliance, image control, and micromanaged interactions.
Shoppers may feel the effects through:
- More forced greetings
- A heightened sense of being watched or monitored
- Less genuine connection with employees who are under pressure
- An environment shaped by corporate risk management rather than community needs
Why This Matters
The Big Beautiful Boycott assesses not just what companies sell, but also how they behave. Target Stores represent a retail environment where workers are overburdened, customer interactions are scripted, and the shopping experience is shaped by corporate mandates rather than genuine community values.
When shoppers walk into Target today, they step into a store culture defined by pressure, image management, and declining investment in the people who keep the store running. The experience is shifting — and not in favor of the workers or the communities Target claims to serve.
Parent company: The Target Corporation
Target Corporation, long perceived as a mainstream retailer with a reputation for inclusivity and community engagement, has undergone a dramatic political and cultural shift. In 2025, the company reversed years of equity work, cut thousands of jobs, and aligned itself with Trump’s political infrastructure—both financially and strategically. These decisions reveal a company increasingly responsive to political pressure, culture-war agitation, and the demands of powerful stakeholders rather than the communities it serves.
Corporate Behavior Shift: DEI Rollbacks and Political Retreat
In early 2025, Target ended its three-year diversity, equity, and inclusion goals, withdrew from the Human Rights Campaign’s Corporate Equality Index, and dismantled programs that provided shelf access and supplier support for Black-, brown-, and minority-owned businesses. Reporting from Reuters and HR Brew documented this retreat, which the company framed as a response to an “evolving external landscape”—widely interpreted as caving to political backlash.
The rollback triggered national outrage and a 40-day boycott organized by civil rights groups, as confirmed by Snopes. Foot traffic declined, and shareholders sued Target for misleading them about the financial and reputational risks tied to abandoning DEI commitments, as reported by CNBC.
Simultaneous Layoffs & Employee Monitoring Policies
On November 7, 2025, Target introduced a new “10-4 policy” requiring employees to smile, wave, or greet any customer within 10 feet and verbally offer assistance within 4 feet—despite concurrently eliminating around 1,800 corporate roles (1,000 layoffs and 800 unfilled job cuts), amounting to roughly 8% of its global corporate workforce. Coverage from Fox19 and Business Insider captured the internal backlash from workers asked to provide heightened “service-policing” amid shrinking staff.
Financial Alignment with Trump’s Political Machine
In 2025, Target made its first-ever contribution to a presidential inaugural fund—donating $1 million to the Trump–Vance Inaugural Committee. This was reported by Business Insider.
The donation followed private meetings between Target leadership—including CEO Brian Cornell—and Donald Trump on tariffs, trade rules, and supply-chain policy, all critical to a retailer that imports nearly half its merchandise. This political courtship was covered by CNBC.
Financial Results vs. Public Commitments
Despite reporting $23.8 billion in Q1 2025 net sales (down only slightly from $24.5 billion the year before), Target refused to reinstate its DEI commitments, supplier equity programs, or accountability structures. This was documented in Target’s own press releases: Q1 Earnings and Belonging Strategy Fact Sheet.
What This Pattern Shows
The timeline is clear: Target dismantled programs supporting marginalized communities, abandoned external accountability, laid off workers, enacted surveillance-style customer-interaction rules, and financially aligned itself with the Trump administration at the exact moment these political forces were pushing an anti-DEI, anti-equity agenda.
These actions demonstrate a shift toward political power alignment rather than public accountability. Target is choosing who it protects and who it discards—and the hierarchy is unambiguous.
Bottom Line
The Big Beautiful Boycott is not about punishing brands for imperfect progress. It is about responding when major corporations move their money, influence, and institutional weight toward political projects that harm workers, marginalized communities, and democratic norms.
Target has made its choice. Now consumers can make theirs.
Contact
These are the public contact methods for this company. If you have thoughts, feedback, or concerns about their actions or policies, these are the channels they provide for hearing from the public.