Stouffer's
A brand known for its frozen comfort meals
Reason: Parent company is evil
Stouffer's is a brand of frozen prepared foods that has been fully owned by Nestlé since the food giant acquired the Stouffer Corporation in 1973. It now operates as part of the Nestlé Meals division within Nestlé USA.
Evidence & Context
Parent company: Nestlé
Nestlé is a horrible company
Nestlé is not just selling food and drinks — it repeatedly makes choices that prioritize profits over children’s health, clean water, workers’ rights, and community well-being. From baby food double standards to illegal water treatment, child labor in its cocoa supply chain, and aggressive extraction of public water, Nestlé’s record shows a pattern of harm that U.S. consumers do not need to fund.
Double Standards in Baby Food and Children’s Health
In 2024, reporting revealed that Nestlé sells baby food with added sugar in developing countries while offering sugar-free versions in the U.S. and Europe . This means that children in lower-income nations — with fewer regulatory protections and less access to healthcare — are being fed products that do not meet the same health standards Nestlé already follows in wealthier markets.
- Bad for U.S. policy: This double standard undermines global public health efforts, including the WHO’s recommendation against added sugar for children under two, by signaling that what is considered “acceptable” can change depending on the strength of a country’s regulations.
- Bad for ethical competitors: U.S. and global companies that apply high standards everywhere are forced to compete against a rival willing to compromise children’s health in markets with less power and oversight.
Water Contamination, Illegal Treatment, and Corporate Coverups
In 2024, France was rocked by a mineral water scandal involving Perrier and other brands. Investigations reported that Perrier, owned by Nestlé, and related operations had used illegal water treatment methods, and that authorities helped keep these practices out of public view. Coverage in outlets such as The Guardian, The New York Times, and Le Monde describes illegal purification filters, raises questions about contamination, and highlights lingering doubts about whether Perrier can prove its water is truly “pure.”
This is not a small labeling issue — it shows a willingness to bend or break rules in order to keep premium “natural” water brands on shelves, and it raises obvious questions about how transparent and trustworthy Nestlé is in any country, including the United States.
Child Labor and Exploitation in the Cocoa Supply Chain
Nestlé has faced long-running allegations that its global cocoa supply chain relies on child labor and, in some cases, forced or trafficked child workers. Analyses and case studies, including work from Systemic Justice, legal scholarship on international human rights and labor, and BBC reporting on U.S. lawsuits over child slavery in West African cocoa farms, document how cocoa used in chocolate products around the world has been tied to hazardous child labor.
- Trade and fairness problems: By sourcing cocoa linked to exploitative labor, Nestlé externalizes human rights costs and gains an unfair price advantage over producers who refuse to use abusive practices.
- U.S. legal fallout: These abuses do not stay “over there.” U.S. courts have heard lawsuits alleging Nestlé’s complicity in child slavery, turning global labor violations into domestic legal and political fights.
Commodifying U.S. Water and Dumping Plastic on Communities
Nestlé also has a decades-long history of aggressively extracting public water in the United States and worldwide. Reporting and advocacy work, including that of IBFAN and Foodwatch, describe how Nestlé has withdrawn millions of gallons of water from public lands and aquifers — including drought-prone areas in California and Michigan — often paying minimal fees while selling that water back to consumers at high margins.
- Political conflict and local costs: Communities and state governments have been forced into expensive, years-long fights over extraction permits and environmental impacts, framing Nestlé’s operations as the privatization of a vital public resource.
- Plastic pollution burden: As one of the world’s biggest bottled-water and packaged-food companies, Nestlé generates massive plastic waste streams. Cities and towns — not Nestlé — are left to pay for disposal, incineration, or often-impossible recycling of that packaging.
Bottom Line
Nestlé’s record is not an isolated mistake or a single bad product. It is a pattern: double standards for children’s health, illegal or deceptive water practices, supply chains tied to child labor, and the extraction and privatization of public resources, followed by mountains of plastic waste. For consumers who care about kids, workers, and communities — at home and abroad — Nestlé is a company that does not deserve their money or their trust.
How to Boycott Stouffer's
Opt for meals from independent delis, sandwich shops, or community-owned eateries rather than frozen entrees from major manufacturers. This helps keep money circulating locally rather than supporting large corporate food producers.
Stouffer’s is currently a brand under Nestlé USA (after acquisitions that date back decades). By reducing purchases of such brands, you reduce financial flows toward these large entities
If your office, school, or organization uses frozen prepared meals or large-scale food providers, suggest switching to local food businesses or fresh-prepared meals rather than relying on frozen brands like Stouffer’s.
If you have retirement, brokerage or investment accounts, check whether funds are invested in companies that own major frozen-meal brands (i.e., Nestlé or its subsidiaries). If so, consider reallocating toward businesses aligned with your values.
Avoid creating additional visibility, endorsements, or sharing content that highlights the brand (such as packaged meal posts). Brand awareness and customer loyalty generate real economic value.
Individuals working for or purchasing the product are not the target; the aim is the corporate level of influence and purchasing decisions.
Ensure that any claims or statements about the brand or its ownership are accurate and verifiable; focus on factual context rather than rumors or unfounded assertions.
Contact
These are the public contact methods for this company. If you have thoughts, feedback, or concerns about their actions or policies, these are the channels they provide for hearing from the public.
Websites
Social
Sources
- Protest at Veyvey: More than 100,000 signatures against Nestlé's double standard over added sugar in baby food
- Report finds Nestlé adds sugars to baby food in low-income countries
- Nestlé accused of double standards over added sugar in baby products sold in poorer countries
- Perrier owner scrutinised after France reportedly covered up illegal water filter treatment
- Mineral water scandal: Nestlé says it removed illegal filters, but must still prove Perrier is pure
- Child Labor in the Global Cocoa Supply Chain: What Nestlé Tells Us About Corporate Harm
- US Supreme Court blocks child slavery lawsuit against chocolate firms
- COP 30: Climate Crisis intensifies water scarcity – Nestlé’s water scandals
- New revelations in the mineral water scandal: Nestlé has apparently been using illegal filtering methods for decades
- Tell Nestle to Stop Adding Sugar to Baby Food
- Nestlé adds sugars to baby food in low-income countries
- Nestlé accused of double standards over added sugar in baby products sold in poorer countries